Jaime Florez‘s visit to Millennia Atlantic University marked an emblematic moment at the intersection of politics, education, and the Hispanic community in the United States. Florez, who serves as the Director of Hispanic Communications for the Republican Party, shared his vision and experience in front of a diverse audience comprised of students and professors from the Universidad Francisco de Vittoria in Madrid, Spain. This meeting represented not only a unique opportunity for cultural and political exchange but also served as a forum for the discussion of critical issues affecting both the Hispanic community in the United States and the country’s overall political landscape.
With a remarkable trajectory that spans from his distinguished career in journalism in Colombia to his involvement in politics in the United States, Jaime Florez embodies the success story of the American dream. His personal experience as an immigrant and his dedication to promoting the values and principles of the Republican Party make him an authoritative and relevant voice in the debate on immigration, politics, and the integration of Hispanic communities into American society.
This article seeks to deeply explore the themes presented by Florez during his presentation at Millennia Atlantic University. In doing so, it aims to provide a rich analysis of the interaction between American politics and the Hispanic community, emphasizing the latter’s crucial role in the socio-political fabric of the United States. Through this approach, the article not only reflects on Florez’s words but also evaluates the impact of his message on the audience present and on the broader community, highlighting the importance of political participation and civic engagement today.
Political and Electoral Context
In the current political landscape of the United States, Jaime Florez emerges as a bridge between the Hispanic community and the Republican Party, at a particularly critical time marked by the anticipation of the presidential elections. Florez’s presentation at Millennia Atlantic University is set in this context, offering a deep and relevant vision that resonates with the concerns and hopes of a diverse electorate. In this segment of the article, we will explore the political and electoral scenario that serves as the backdrop for his intervention, emphasizing the importance of Hispanic votes in the U.S. elections and the political strategies at play.
Donald Trump’s Candidacy and the General Election
The political climate is at a boiling point, with Donald Trump seeking the Republican nomination to face Joe Biden in the upcoming general election. This scenario reflects not only the country’s political polarization but also the critical importance of the Hispanic electorate in the election outcome. Florez, positioned at the epicenter of these dynamics, underscores Trump’s likely nomination and its impact on the electoral contest against Biden, outlining a battleground where every vote counts and the Hispanic community can play a decisive role.
The Role of the Hispanic Community in Elections
The Hispanic community in the United States, with its demographic growth and cultural diversity, has become a key factor on the national political board. Its ability to influence the election outcome is indisputable, especially in swing states where the margin of victory can be narrow. Florez emphasizes this point, acknowledging the Republican Party’s need to connect with these voters and align their policies and messages with the values and concerns of the Hispanic community.
Challenges and Opportunities
The current political and electoral context poses both challenges and opportunities for the Republican Party and the Hispanic community. On the one hand, there’s the possibility of strengthening relationships and building bridges of understanding that transcend partisan divisions. On the other, the risk of alienation due to policies perceived as contrary to Hispanics’ interests could impact electoral support. Florez advocates for an approach that recognizes and celebrates diversity within national unity, seeking a balance between security and inclusion, respect for the law, and compassion towards immigrants.
This political and electoral context defines the setting in which Jaime Florez’s presentation unfolds, highlighting the critical importance of the Hispanic community in the political future of the United States. By addressing these issues, Florez invites reflection on the role of the Hispanic community in shaping American politics and society.
The Republican Party and Its History
The history of the Republican Party is a rich and complex narrative deeply intertwined with the political and social evolution of the United States. From its founding in 1854 to the present, the party has undergone significant transformations, adapting to and responding to changes in the nation’s socio-political fabric. Jaime Florez, in his presentation at Millennia Atlantic University, offers a unique perspective on this trajectory, highlighting the fundamental principles that have guided the Republican Party over the years and their relevance in the contemporary political context.
Foundation and Evolution of the Party
The Republican Party was founded in the 19th century with an explicit commitment to the abolition of slavery. This fundamental principle reflected a strong commitment to freedom and equality, values that resonated with a broad section of American society at the time. The victory of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, the first Republican president, marked a turning point in the history of the United States, culminating in the Civil War and the emancipation of slaves. Over the years, the party has been instrumental in implementing policies that have shaped the country’s course, from Reconstruction to the industrialization era and beyond.
Fundamental Principles and Party Agenda
The principles guiding the Republican Party have evolved, but certain pillars have remained constant, such as the emphasis on individual freedom, limited government, economic prosperity, and respect for American values and traditions. These values are reflected in the policies and agendas the party has promoted over the years, including the defense of free enterprise, tax reduction, and support for the armed forces and national security.
In his speech, Florez highlights how the party has responded to contemporary challenges, including combating what it perceives as extreme policies from the left. The promotion of electoral integrity and the defense of fundamental freedoms are seen as natural extensions of its historical commitment to democracy and the rule of law.
Florez’s insights into the Republican Party’s history and principles not only serve as a reminder of its pivotal role in shaping the United States but also as a reflection on how it continues to influence the nation’s political and social landscape. By revisiting the foundational values and the evolution of the party, Florez provides a framework for understanding the current political dynamics and the party’s approach to addressing the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century. His perspective underscores the importance of maintaining a dialogue between the party’s historical commitments and its adaptation to the changing needs of the American people, highlighting the ongoing relevance of the Republican Party in navigating the complexities of modern governance and societal change.
Challenges and Opportunities
The historical trajectory of the Republican Party highlights its ability to navigate through periods of profound change and adapt to new political and social realities. Florez’s presentation invites reflection on how the party can continue evolving to address the challenges of the 21st century while maintaining its fundamental principles. The relationship with the growing Hispanic community in the United States, managing immigration, and focusing on inclusive economic policies are just some of the aspects that will define the party’s future in today’s complex political landscape.
The history of the Republican Party, as articulated by Florez, is one of adaptation and commitment to values it considers inherently American. Its ability to look towards the future, while drawing on the lessons of the past, will be crucial in its effort to remain relevant and effective in promoting its vision for the United States.
Immigration and the American Dream
The theme of immigration and its link to the American dream holds a central place in Jaime Florez’s presentation at Millennia Atlantic University, reflecting not only his personal experience as an immigrant but also the Republican Party’s stance on this significant issue. Florez’s story, marked by the search for safety, freedom, and opportunities in the United States, embodies the aspiration of the American dream that has motivated millions of immigrants over the years. In this section, we explore the complex interaction between immigration policies, the American dream, and their relevance to the Hispanic community and American society as a whole.
Florez’s Personal Experience and the American Dream
Jaime Florez shares his journey from Colombia to the United States, a personal narrative that illustrates the challenges and triumphs of the immigrant experience. His story highlights the importance of personal security and freedom of expression, values he found in the United States and which contrast with the threats to life and censorship he faced in his native country. This personal narrative not only humanizes the debate on immigration but also serves as a testament to the power of the American dream to transform lives. Through this lens, Florez’s experience sheds light on the broader implications of immigration policy and the enduring allure of the American dream, underscoring the need for policies that reflect the values of opportunity and inclusivity at the heart of the American ethos.
Immigration Policies and Their Impact
Immigration policies are a subject of intense debate in the United States, with deep implications for the Hispanic community and society at large. Florez criticizes the current administration’s policies, particularly regarding border management and the treatment of immigrants. He advocates for orderly and legal immigration, highlighting the need for a system that respects both the law and human dignity. This approach seeks to balance national security with compassion and recognition of immigrants’ valuable contributions to the country.
The Role of Immigration in the Development of the United States
Immigration has played a fundamental role in the development and shaping of the United States identity. Florez emphasizes this point, arguing that immigrants have significantly contributed to the American economy, culture, and society. From this perspective, the American dream benefits not only the immigrants seeking opportunities but also the country that is enriched by their energy, talent, and diversity.
Challenges and Opportunities of the American Dream Today
The American Dream faces new challenges in the 21st century, including economic inequality, social tensions, and debates over national identity. Florez’s presentation invites reflection on how to revitalize this dream to ensure it remains accessible to everyone, including immigrants. This involves considering policies that promote inclusion, economic growth, and social justice, ensuring that the United States continues to be a beacon of hope and opportunity.
Florez’s discussion on immigration and the American dream offers a complex and nuanced vision that goes beyond political slogans, focusing on the human experiences at the heart of these issues. By concentrating on his own story and the policies affecting the Hispanic community, Florez highlights the interdependence between immigration and the socioeconomic fabric of the United States. Ultimately, the American dream is presented not just as an ideal for immigrants to attain but as an ongoing national construction project that requires commitment, empathy, and equitable policies.
Strategies to Attract the Hispanic Vote
The significance of the Hispanic vote in the American political landscape is an unavoidable reality, marked by demographic growth and the increasing influence of this community on election outcomes. Jaime Florez’s presentation at Millennia Atlantic University precisely addressed this topic, underscoring the strategic importance of Hispanic voters and the tactics implemented by the Republican Party to win their support. This segment of the article delves into the analysis of these strategies, assessing their impact and relevance in the context of the upcoming elections. The Republican Party’s efforts to connect with Hispanic voters involve a multifaceted approach, including the promotion of policies that resonate with their values and concerns, such as economic opportunities, education, and healthcare. Additionally, the party aims to engage the community through outreach programs and the inclusion of Hispanic leaders within its ranks, demonstrating a commitment to diversity and the recognition of the Hispanic community’s role in shaping the future of the United States.
Demographic Analysis and Electoral Trends
The Hispanic community in the United States represents a diverse and growing electoral segment, with varied political inclinations that reflect its rich cultural, socioeconomic, and generational differences. Acknowledging this diversity, Florez emphasized the need for an approach that goes beyond generalizations, seeking to connect with Hispanics through messages that resonate with their individual experiences and aspirations. This informed demographic approach is crucial for designing campaigns that aim not only to win votes but also to build long-lasting and trustworthy relationships with the Hispanic community.
Communication Strategies and Key Messages
In his speech, Florez highlighted the importance of communication efforts that reflect the values and concerns of Hispanic voters, including the economy, education, health, and immigration. The use of Spanish-language media and establishing a direct dialogue with the community are central elements of this strategy, aiming to overcome linguistic and cultural barriers that may hinder mutual understanding. Additionally, the relevance of presenting candidates and representatives who share or deeply understand the Hispanic experience was emphasized, strengthening representation and identification with the party.
Examples of Successful Strategies and Areas for Improvement
The Republican Party’s success in attracting the Hispanic vote in certain elections and regions provides valuable lessons on effective approaches, such as promoting policies that support entrepreneurship and job creation, aspects highly valued by many Hispanics. However, Florez also acknowledges areas for improvement, particularly in addressing sensitive issues like immigration in a way that reflects both firmness in the law and compassion and recognition of immigrants’ contributions to American society.
The Role of Media and Cultural Identity
The strategy to capture the Hispanic vote also involves an understanding of how media and cultural expression influence political perception. Florez points to the need for an approach that celebrates and respects the rich cultural diversity of the Hispanic community, using media platforms that are popular and trusted within the community to disseminate political messages.
The Republican Party’s approach to the Hispanic vote, as explained by Jaime Florez, is multifaceted, recognizing the complexity and diversity of this community. The effectiveness of these strategies will depend on the party’s ability to listen and respond to the needs and aspirations of Hispanics, treating them not as a monolithic block but as individuals with unique stories, challenges, and dreams. This respectful and understanding-based approach is not only essential for attracting the Hispanic vote but also for strengthening the democratic fabric of the United States, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued.
Final Reflections and Future Projections
Jaime Florez’s presentation at Millennia Atlantic University, which covered everything from the importance of the Hispanic vote in American politics to immigration policies and the American dream, provides a rich tapestry of reflections on the current state and future of the relationship between the Hispanic community and the Republican Party. This analysis not only underscores the present challenges but also sheds light on possible paths forward, emphasizing the need for ongoing dialogue, inclusive policies, and a genuine commitment to democratic principles.
Impact of the Presentation on the Audience and the Academic Community
Florez’s talk resonated with the audience of students and academics from diverse backgrounds, potentially influencing the broader public discourse on American politics and the integration of the Hispanic community. By sharing his personal and professional experience, Florez humanized topics that are often discussed in abstract terms, allowing for a deeper understanding of the real implications of policies and political rhetoric.
Reflections on the Future of Relations
Looking forward, the interaction between the Hispanic community and the Republican Party appears to be at a crossroads. The growing demographic and electoral importance of Hispanics in the United States implies that their support is not only desirable but essential for any party seeking to secure a solid and diverse electoral base. However, earning this support will require more than targeted campaign strategies; it will need an authentic engagement with the concerns and aspirations of the Hispanic community, as well as policies that reflect this engagement.
Assessment of Challenges and Opportunities
The challenges are significant, from overcoming linguistic and cultural barriers to addressing contentious issues like immigration in a manner that reflects values of justice and compassion. Yet, these challenges also present opportunities for growth and improvement, both for the Republican Party and for American democracy as a whole. By embracing diversity and promoting inclusion, the party can not only expand its electoral base but also enrich its platform with new perspectives and solutions to national challenges.
Future Projections
The relationship between the Republican Party and the Hispanic community in the coming years will likely be dynamic, evolving as both sides strive to understand and meet the needs of the other. For the Republican Party, this may mean a reevaluation of some policies and stances, as well as continued investment in community outreach and relationship building. For the Hispanic community, it represents an opportunity to influence political discourse and ensure that their voices are heard at the highest levels of decision-making.
Conclusion
Jaime Florez‘s presentation offers a valuable starting point for reflection and dialogue on the intersection of politics, immigration, and the American dream in the context of the Hispanic community in the United States. Looking forward, the ability to address these issues with empathy, respect, and a willingness to engage will be crucial for forging a path forward that benefits the entire nation. Ultimately, success in this endeavor will reaffirm the principles of diversity, inclusion, and democracy that are at the heart of America.
Transcript:
Thank you all for coming. Thank you very much. It’s a pleasure for us, here at this university and especially on behalf of the Republican Party, to offer you a warm welcome to the United States of America. Amid an electoral campaign that has been underway for just over a year, it’s very likely that in tonight’s elections, our candidate, former President Donald Trump, will obtain the necessary delegates to secure the Republican nomination at our convention on July 15 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Therefore, we will be ready for the general election on November 5, where we will elect Joe Biden’s successor. This is how we have prepared. The contenders will be the President of the United States, Joe Biden, for the Democratic Party, and the former President of the United States, Donald Trump, for the Republican Party.
Now, let’s talk a bit about the Republican Party, and we will take the liberty of reading this, which is our fundamental basis. Copies are available for those who are interested. Who are we in the Republican Party? The Republican Party was originally founded in 1854 with the promise of abolishing slavery. The Republican Party has always stood for freedom, prosperity, and opportunity.
And, as we see how these principles are attacked today by the far left, we in the Republican Party remain committed in a national effort to fight for what we call our proven agenda. The party has shown throughout its history that it has proposed some ideas that have been beneficial to the United States, which have been implemented and continue to be successful.
We want to carry that message of optimism and opportunity to all Americans. We want to grow our party, which we have been successfully doing. For some time now, we have been promoting something fundamental to us: electoral integrity. As you know, some have historically claimed that, in the democracy we live in today, in most countries, elections are not won by those who have the most votes, but by those who count them.
For us, it is fundamental that people vote with full confidence, that they can choose their leaders and rulers, and that elections are not only clean, transparent, and fair but also reflect the will of the voters. Therefore, for us, electoral integrity is fundamental. We want to elect Republicans to all offices and in all elections.
We want to have the best candidates. The principles of our party recognize the freedoms granted by God and, at the same time, promote opportunities for all Americans. Our platform is based on the belief in freedom, economic prosperity, the preservation of American values and traditions, and the restoration of the American dream. This dream is not only for those who were born here, live here, have their family here, and have been here for generations, but also for those who come to the United States precisely seeking the opportunity to find their American dream.
I want to take a moment here for a brief aside. Although I graduated as an architect many years ago, I discovered that journalism was my calling.
I dedicated myself to journalism in my home country, Colombia. During the decade in which I worked as a journalist there, more than 100 journalists were killed. They began to threaten me too, for not agreeing with the way the FARC guerrillas promoted what they called their peace talks. My wife and I had to take our little daughter, just one-year-old, and come to the United States.
People ask me, what was the first thing you noticed when you arrived in the United States? And I answer that I can kiss my daughter when I leave in the morning, knowing that I will return in the afternoon to give her another one. I didn’t feel that in Colombia. Therefore, when people talk to me about the American dream, I dream of this: the freedom to practice my profession, to do what I know, to do what I believe benefits the community I live in, with complete freedom, but above all, with absolute security.
As a party, we support any policy that serves to preserve the American dream and to ensure people’s freedom and the right to take advantage of the economic opportunities this country offers. We believe in the need for the government to stimulate economic growth. When I listened to Jairo talk here about entrepreneurs, businesses, and professionals, I thought about the magnificent opportunity this country offers to someone who, with a passport and a visa, can come to a university like this, prepare themselves, go out into the market to look for work, create companies, generate development, offer employment to other people, and progress in this country.
We are very concerned about the trend of giving things away to people, which we have observed in some recent governments. In the last three years, during the Biden Administration, 9 million people have crossed the border. We have absolutely nothing against immigration; I am an immigrant.
I have been in this country for just over 25 years and we have been happy here. We have had all the opportunities, but we have never asked the government for a penny. We didn’t come to the United States to beg; we came to look for opportunities to get ahead, which we found and are taking advantage of. We are very concerned that this administration is housing immigrants in hotels in Manhattan, New York.
They are giving them debit cards, and we are talking about significant amounts of money. These are people who come from countries where the same leftist trends destroyed private enterprise, development, and job generation, and they arrive here without having worked. Some people have been unemployed for 20 years, people who have spent 20 years without the right to support their families.
Upon arriving here, instead of offering them opportunities, training them for a job, and preparing them to be self-sufficient, our government is providing them with housing, food, education for their children, health services, and everything else, at no cost to them. These benefits do have costs, yes, but for us, the taxpayers who pay taxes, work, and strive every day to support our families, somehow we are allowing our administration to spend the money we pay in taxes on providing undeserved benefits to people who have not made the effort to earn them.
The legacy of the Republican Party, originally founded in 1854 to end slavery, compels us to patriotically defend the values of the United States. While the left tries to destroy what makes our country great, the Republican Party is prepared and willing to defend our nation and our way of life.
In my role as the Hispanic Communications Director, I often wonder whether my title should be “Director Hispano de Comunicaciones” or “Director de Comunicaciones Hispanas” in the United States. I prefer the term “Hispanic director” because the word “Hispanic” refers to me, not the communications. However, I’ve noticed that sometimes I’m called one way and sometimes the other.
Upon reflection, I believe the correct option is “Director of Hispanic Communications,” as it refers to communications directed at the Hispanic community. Nevertheless, considering the length of the title compared to the salary, I’ve thought about shortening it.
Why is the focus on Hispanic communications, especially in Spanish, so important to us? In this country, there is a significant percentage of Hispanic citizens. There’s a question of whether we should call ourselves Latinos, Hispanics, or Latin Americans. I’ve always believed that the term “Hispanic” refers to the language. However, by referring exclusively to “Hispanics,” we exclude Latin Americans who do not speak Spanish, such as Brazilians, who are also Latinos.
We have partly rid ourselves of this dilemma because the Brazilian community is not as large compared to, for example, the Mexican or migration from other Latin American countries, excluding perhaps Paraguay. However, the rest of the countries have a significant Hispanic and national representation. About 17% of the population of the United States is of Hispanic origin, whether first, second, or third generation.
Many of them, the vast majority, have Spanish as their first or second language, except in some cities. For example, in San Antonio, Texas, where surnames like Rodríguez, González, Pérez, Gómez, and Jiménez prevail, surprisingly, Spanish is seldom spoken, and Spanish-language media are almost non-existent.
Communities have assimilated so much into American culture that they dominate English much better than Spanish. Unfortunately, this phenomenon is quite different from what was experienced in the 1960s and 1970s, when migration from Latin American countries began to increase in the United States, especially after World War II.
People who arrived in Miami, for example, today form a very important Cuban community, which began to arrive mainly after Fidel Castro’s revolution in 1959. These people had an urgency to learn English for two main reasons: the first, to survive, and the second, perhaps more importantly, especially for the younger ones, was to be accepted within the society and the group of people they began to live with.
For many, at that time, speaking Spanish was even a cause for shame. Children didn’t want to speak Spanish because it made them feel very different from their classmates. Therefore, learning English was fundamental. Many households even eliminated the use of Spanish to facilitate their children’s quicker assimilation into the English language.
This has changed over time, partly thanks to certain figures in the entertainment world who became famous while being Hispanic. Names like Ricky Martin, Enrique Iglesias, and Shakira, among others, made being Hispanic considered ‘cool’ in the United States.
Today, the Hispanic community is fundamental in the United States. For us, as the Republican Party, it is imperative to win over this community, given that it has been and this year more than ever will be decisive in the outcome of the November 5th elections.
The President of the United States can be elected by Hispanic votes from key states such as Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, and Georgia. In other states with significant Hispanic communities, these votes are out of reach for us, like in California or New York, or are already on our side, as is the case with Florida and Texas.
It’s crucial to fight with determination to win these four mentioned states. How do we achieve this? Let’s go back to the functioning of the presidential election in the United States and the role of the Electoral College. Unlike other countries, where the candidate with the most votes directly wins, in the United States, the process is state by state, with an assigned number of Electoral College votes based on each state’s congressional representation.
In Florida, for example, we have 27 congresspeople, and the number of congresspeople is determined by the census conducted every ten years. Depending on the number of inhabitants, a state can have more or fewer representatives in the House. Each state has two senators, regardless of its population or size, which adds up to a total of 100 senators and, currently, 428 representatives in Congress. In the case of Florida, there are 27 representatives and two senators, totaling 29 members in the Electoral College, who are selected by the party after the elections. The primary elections, which are held next week, will allow us to define who will be the majority’s preferred candidate to be the President of the United States.
When the November election is held, the members of the Electoral College will be elected, who will meet a few weeks later to decide who will be the President of the United States. In most states, except two, all the Electoral College votes are assigned to the candidate who wins by at least one vote difference over the other.
For example, if Donald Trump wins in Florida by ten votes, the 29 Electoral College votes would be assigned to Donald Trump in the November elections. This raises the situation where you can win the popular vote, that is, have more total votes, but if you do not win the right number of delegates state by state, you might not get the necessary delegates to win the presidency of the United States.
What was the purpose of this system? When this country was founded, the founding fathers saw that there could be many more inhabitants in the coastal areas, east and west, than in the central states. Today, if the election depended solely on the popular vote, probably four states like Texas, California, New York, and, say, New Jersey or Michigan, could elect the President of the United States, leaving a large number of states without a voice or vote. To better balance representation among the states, the Electoral College system was created.
Does anyone have any questions about this topic, or can we move on to the next? What have we been doing in the Republican Party to attract Hispanics? We have been employing a strategy that has worked well in recent years: we have convinced Hispanics living in this country that the values and principles of the Republican Party align more with ours as Hispanics than those of the Democratic Party.
We fundamentally believe in the importance of family, faith, freedom, democracy, the right to prosperity and economic development, as well as in less government intervention in our finances and personal lives. We think the government should be small and manageable, not an entity on which a large part of the population depends as the sole generator of employment and opportunities, which could allow the ruling party to electorally manipulate that population. If a government employee is forced to vote for a candidate under the threat of losing their job, they will end up voting for that candidate.
We believe the government should be reduced and people should have more freedom to spend the money they earn as they see fit. Unlike some of our adversaries in the other political party, we are not convinced that the best way to manage the money earned by people is through tax collection for the government to spend. Our experience in this country and observations in others indicate that the more money the government handles, the more prone it is to waste.
Does anyone have any questions on this topic? If you have questions, please request the microphone so your words can be recorded.
Hello. I don’t know if I need to press something for my question to be recorded. My question is about the perception in Spanish-speaking countries regarding the dichotomy of right and left. The right is often associated with a more omnipresent state, in contrast to the more American or Anglo-Saxon view of a state that intervenes as little as possible.
Do you think there are changes in the Republican Party due to the influence of certain Hispanic groups in the United States? Yes, we are seeing this, especially because the majority of Hispanics living in the United States didn’t come here as tourists; they came seeking to survive. In my case, I came first to save my life and second, to offer my daughters opportunities that I couldn’t have provided in my home country.
If we take communities in Doral as an example, you’ll find Venezuelans, Cubans, and Nicaraguans in South Florida. These people fled political systems that denied them growth opportunities and forced them to live in misery. They have had to leave their countries to survive and seek a better future for their families, as they had no opportunities in their home countries due to implemented socialist policies.
For example, Venezuela, which was the richest country in Latin America and has the world’s largest oil reserves, has become a country in a miserable situation, with millions of Venezuelans fleeing just to be able to survive.
We believe that, unlike these Hispanics, bringing socialist policies here to the United States would be a mistake. These experiences serve as a warning not to fall into leftist policies that could ruin this country, as happened in others. For instance, at one time, the Soviet Union competed on equal terms with the United States in various aspects, but its socialist or communist economic model failed.
Here, although we don’t live in a “land of milk and honey,” we have economic and political stability that serves as an example for other countries. We may be politically opposed until November 5th, but on November 6th, we will have a president, whether a new one or the previous one, and the country will move forward. This contrasts with situations in Latin America, like in Chile with the election of Gabriel Boric, where there was fear that the country would follow a similar path to leaders like Hugo Chávez or Nicolás Maduro.
For that reason, it had to follow the course that was already marked by the situation in Chile, from which it cannot easily deviate. In a way, this is working well. Although investment is made in other aspects that we do not mention and do not directly see, it seems to me that it is something positive. I need help organizing my ideas because a book containing the keyword can be enlightening.
First of all, thank you very much. It’s a pleasure to hear your opinions, although I am going to point out some aspects with which I disagree. For example, regarding the issue of slavery. Indeed, it is commonly explained that the Civil War in the United States was driven by the desire of the northern states to end slavery.
However, what seems more plausible to me is that the southern states were economically dependent on the United Kingdom, as they were producers of raw materials for British industry. What the northern states wanted was to make the United States completely independent from its former metropolis in economic terms. Therefore, the reason to confront the southern states was not to end slavery, but to get rid of an economic system that kept the country dependent on the United Kingdom.
From my point of view, and as the Boston Strangler said, “Let’s take it one step at a time.” As I understand it, what originated the Civil War in the United States was neither one thing nor the other, but rather the defense, by both the southern and northern states, of the right of each state to determine its destiny, to legislate accordingly, and not be subject to common legislation for all states, which were not 50 at that time.
Essentially, the independence of the states and their right to manage their affairs without depending on a centralized power in Washington was the central issue. The other two reasons, in my view, are the consequences of this conflict of interests between the states.
It seems that what was being violated was the right of each state to direct its own destiny. Changing the subject, rather than a question, I want to make an observation.
It is often said that this is the country of opportunities. However, I see it as a dominant empire, similar to others that have existed in the past. This empire, like all the previous ones, has sought to destabilize other regions of the world to attract immigration and educate the elites of other countries within its sphere of influence.
This strategy, existing since ancient Macedonia, has been analyzed in books like “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” by John Perkins, who describes how the United States has destabilized countries in the Middle East and Latin America. By financing Islamic organizations in the Middle East to attack the USSR or supporting guerrillas in Latin America, the United States has created internal divisions that prevent the progress of these countries, as part of a strategy of domination. This practice is not exclusive to the United States; it was also used by Rome and other empires.
I believe that, although it is known as the country of opportunities, its military dominance over the world is intimidating, evidenced in situations like those in Ukraine or northeastern Syria. While the United States has contributed positively to the world, it has also taken questionable actions. It’s interesting to consider who dominates in the relationship with China, especially when observing that a significant percentage of products in stores like Walmart are made in China, even during the pandemic, this country was turned to for the purchase of medical supplies.
Regarding immigration, the reality is that obtaining a U.S. visa can be a nightmare, which contradicts the idea that the United States actively promotes immigration to its territory. As a Colombian, I can assert that the influence in the conflicts of Latin America does not come solely from the United States but also from countries like Cuba, the Soviet Union, and China. Moreover, it’s important to recognize that the financing of guerrilla groups in Colombia by Americans is mostly through drug consumption, and not directly by the government of the United States.
I wouldn’t blindly defend the U.S. government for two reasons: they don’t need my defense, and my actions would go unnoticed. Additionally, the U.S. government has low sympathy among its own citizens, reflected in low electoral participation. Many citizens don’t vote not out of complacency but due to a loss of confidence in the government.
It’s true that throughout the history of humanity, no government has completely solved the most serious problems, like hunger. If there were a real interest on the part of governments, this problem would have already been solved. In reality, no government has resolved either the problem of hunger or housing and now they face the challenge of climate change, which seems an impossible task.
Instead of waiting for the government to solve everything, as citizens, we should do our part in solving our problems. Now, changing the subject, my name is Paloma.
I find it amusing that the Democratic Party in the United States is said to be leftist, as here in Spain, that would equate to a Chavista dictatorship. I follow current events through El País and Spanish Television, so I am aware of the political dynamics. My question is, considering there are many immigrants fleeing dictatorships and the lack of resources in their countries, what does the Republican Party, the party you support, do to help these immigrant families seeking opportunities, without simply giving them money?
We, as Republicans, support immigration within a legal and orderly framework. I am concerned about the situation of the last three years, with a significant increase in undocumented immigrants. Even before, we already had a considerable number of immigrants waiting to regularize their immigration status.
Many of them work and pay taxes here, yet are considered second-class citizens due to the limitations they face because of their immigration status. Although they have been granted work permits and documents for defense, this does not guarantee their long-term stability. Eventually, for fiscal responsibility, someone will have to say that we cannot continue with this policy, leaving these people in limbo.
The proposal of mass deportation by President Trump raises serious questions. It is not only questionable to assume the luxury of affording such a measure, but we are also failing to provide immigrants with the lifestyle and quality of life they seek when coming to the United States.
There must be something good about this country for 9 million people to have decided to come here, despite challenges like crossing the Darién Gap, which is no easy task. It’s not like taking a flight from here to Orlando; it’s the complete opposite.
Crossing the Darién Gap is a significant risk. Encountering coyotes who facilitate crossing the border represents a danger. Robberies, assaults, and rapes are everyday events on this journey, and people must be aware of it. Many were motivated to come here based on promises from the current U.S. presidential campaign, contrasting with the previous administration’s policy of building a wall. I do not like the idea of the wall; nobody does. It’s expensive, difficult to maintain, and ultimately doesn’t solve the problem. However, something must be done because a country without defined borders lacks existence.
Let’s reflect on history: in 1492, the expulsion of the Arabs was crucial for Spain’s cultural identity. If that had not happened, today we would be speaking Arabic instead of Spanish. There are times when it’s necessary to defend identity, sovereignty, culture, country, people, and family. The time has come for the United States to do the same.
I understand your point about solidarity. That’s why we promote orderly and legal immigration, where people can come to this country in a dignified manner. The United States Constitution guarantees the right to asylum for those whose lives are at risk.
However, seeking asylum due to poverty or the corruption of elected rulers should not be a burden on American taxpayers. In Venezuela, for example, the current dictatorship is the result of elections in which Hugo Chávez was elected by Venezuelans. Although he later betrayed their trust, it was not Americans who elected him.
The situation is similar to what happened with Fidel Castro in Cuba 50 years earlier. Let’s not deceive ourselves: if everyone in a difficult economic situation in their country had the right to move to the United States, there would be very few inhabitants left in Nordic countries, for example. The issue is complex and requires well-thought-out solutions.
So, let’s speak plainly. I want to comment on what he said. If the United States were that empire you mention, which intervenes at will, toppling governments like Cuba, Nicaragua, or even Venezuela would be simple for them if they truly had that intention. However, it has not happened. For example, the way the United States acquired the Philippines, by exploiting its ship to justify a war against Spain, shows that if they wanted to continue with those tactics, they could easily do so.
I don’t defend the actions of American leaders over the last 20 years. Don’t make me answer for actions from 121 years ago. However, as a Colombian, I also remember what happened between Panama and Colombia, and how the United States intervened.
The American tradition of a non-interventionist state, exemplified by figures like Ronald Reagan, contrasts with the trend in Spanish-speaking countries toward a larger state. You ask if the Republican Party is adopting an approach towards a larger state. As for Robert Kennedy and his impact on elections, I believe he currently has no significant influence on American politics, given the existing polarization.
The concern is that the population is more motivated by the rejection of Donald Trump or Joe Biden than by the possibility of choosing the best representative for the country. As for what we Republicans do, we insist on a smaller state, which creates favorable conditions for private investment and reduces citizens’ dependence on the government.
Our adversaries often suggest increasing taxes on the wealthy, arguing that they disproportionately benefit from the country’s infrastructure and development. I worked with a governor who claimed that reducing taxes on entrepreneurs encourages investment in their companies, which, in turn, creates more jobs. This approach is based on the belief that entrepreneurs will reinvest that money in their businesses, expanding them and creating more job opportunities.
In a state like Florida, the fundamental source of income is what we call the sales tax, or in some countries, the value-added tax (VAT). The state’s economy depends on this. When a person is unemployed, they cannot buy and, therefore, do not generate sales taxes.
On the other hand, by obtaining employment and making purchases for the household and personal needs, every expense contributes to the government through taxes. So, the idea of charging more taxes to the rich, what effect would it have? Take, for example, Elon Musk; if he were to be taxed 25%, it could disincentivize him from investing more in his companies, thinking, why expand if a large part of the profits will go to the government, which also tends to waste resources?
It is questioned why the United States does not invest more in Latin America to create jobs and prevent migration northward. It is important to note that the migration issue is not exclusive to Latin America. A few weeks ago, in Washington, I spoke with Border Patrol personnel and was informed that 80% of the people crossing the border from Mexico do not speak Spanish, raising questions about their origin, motivations, and backgrounds.
How to integrate such a diverse society? Where will the resources come from to ensure their well-being in the United States? It’s a significant challenge.
The governor previously mentioned rightly argued: how can the government believe it will spend taxpayers’ money better than the taxpayers themselves? Allowing people to keep more of their money allows them to start businesses, boost their businesses, and foster economic development, something that is threatened by policies of expansive governments.
Regarding the countries of the Northern Triangle of Latin America and Mexico, we face the problem that they significantly depend on remittances sent by their citizens working in the United States. For example, 13% of Mexico’s GDP comes from these remittances, making it unlikely that their governments will fully collaborate in resolving the migration issue, given the economic benefit it represents.
Finally, my name is Diego. I want to thank you for the presentation. As a Spaniard and European, having recently arrived here, one of the things that has struck me most, even though I have lived in the United States for a while, is…
I want to focus on the cultural aspect, specifically on the issue of racism, as it is a highly discussed matter that I believe could have a significant impact on the November 5th elections. You mentioned the importance of faith for the Republican Party, considering it one of the key values to attract the Hispanic population, which is in the majority.
Historically, the United States has an Anglo-Saxon rather than Hispanic tradition and culture. My question is whether you consider the United States to be a racist country, as it has been frequently pointed out and as it seems to have a certain reputation internationally, especially in recent years. Furthermore, do you think the predominant culture in the United States influences this aspect? That would be my first question. Now, moving on to a second, more friendly question about the primary process. But let’s return to the first point, as my memory can’t hold more.
Is the United States a racist country? My answer is a resounding no. Let me share a personal experience. I completed my university studies in architecture at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where I lived for five years. In Brazil, especially outside some southern states, the black population is significantly large. Is there racism in Brazil? No, quite the opposite. Afro-Brazilians actively participate in cultural, economic, and financial spheres. Is there persecution? Not exactly. There is some social non-acceptance towards some members of the black community, but not because of their skin color, rather due to their economic situation.
The same happens in the United States. Discrimination against African Americans is not due to their race but to their economic stratum. A country that has elected an African American president for two consecutive terms can hardly be considered racist.
The case of George Floyd, whose death at the hands of the police was a cowardly and unacceptable act, does not define the country as racist. If something similar happened to the Hispanic community, sometimes we feel that the police do not treat us with the same condescension as those with white skin and blue eyes.
As a Colombian, I remember a time dominated by drug trafficking and the Medellín Cartel. If a police officer stopped me on the street and discovered my nationality, the implications would be huge. Once, during a press conference at Miami airport, where security had been increased for flights from Colombia, I questioned whether all the drug traffickers arriving were Colombian. The answer was not all, but yes, 98%.
In the United States, we are so cautious with the racial issue that for some time, the media have avoided identifying criminals by race or publishing their photographs, given that a significant percentage does not have the “expected” skin color. This reflects, perhaps, certain racial prejudices in the system, but also underscores the failures of society in offering opportunities to those who commit their first crime.
I don’t believe this is a problem of racism per se, but of a society with deficiencies in the social sphere, communities without the necessary support for their youth, beyond the color of their skin. However, the United States has implemented measures like Affirmative Action, offering educational, housing, and employment opportunities to people of certain races, which, although well-intentioned, can be discriminatory in reverse. For example, in the academic field, Asian Americans have complained about limitations imposed to balance admissions to universities, suggesting a form of reverse discrimination.
Now, regarding the contribution of Hispanics to the United States, I believe they greatly add to the country’s cultural diversity and richness. Historically, many Hispanics came to feel ashamed of their culture and identity, but I firmly believe that the United States is enriched and strengthened by each culture that integrates into its social fabric. Hispanic immigrants have not only much to learn but also much to offer, enriching the cultural, economic, and social diversity of this country.
I wonder if this perception remains the same today, and that’s why I would like to know what they can contribute, considering they have already contributed significantly. The view of us has changed significantly in the last three or four decades.
Walking through this city, as well as others where I have daughters living in New York and Chicago, the presence of restaurants of Latin American and Spanish origin, some excellent, that have spread throughout American cities is notable.
What do we contribute? Our entrepreneurial spirit, our culture, our diversity, so valued in contemporary America, and our desire to progress. It is said that this is a country of immigrants, but the definition of an immigrant has evolved.
Historically, immigrants from various backgrounds came to the United States seeking work after overcoming adversities. Today, some newcomers seem more interested in immediate assistance than in finding employment or educating themselves. There has been no foresight on how to integrate these immigrants into productive projects, such as infrastructure construction, which complicates their assimilation.
Regarding Donald Trump and his appeal to the Latin American vote, there are three main reasons: during his administration, Hispanics experienced the lowest unemployment rate, a significant increase in their income, and a greater ability to acquire their own homes compared to previous administrations.
I wonder if this perception remains the same today, and that’s why I would like to know what they can contribute, considering they have already made significant contributions. The view of us has changed significantly over the last three or four decades.
Walking through this city, and others where I have daughters living in New York and Chicago, the presence of restaurants of Latin American and Spanish origin, some excellent, that have spread throughout American cities is notable.
What do we contribute? Our entrepreneurial spirit, our culture, our diversity, are so valued in contemporary America, and our desire to progress. It is said that this is a country of immigrants, but the definition of an immigrant has evolved.
Historically, immigrants from various origins came to the United States seeking work after overcoming adversities. Today, some newcomers seem more interested in immediate assistance than in finding employment or educating themselves. There has been no foresight on how to integrate these immigrants into productive projects, such as infrastructure construction, which complicates their assimilation.
Regarding Donald Trump and his relationship with the Latin American vote, there are three main reasons why his administration attracted the support of Hispanics: during his government, Hispanics experienced the lowest unemployment rate, a significant increase in their income, and a greater ability to acquire their housing compared to previous administrations.
The American dream is more directly defined as owning one’s own home. However, there are other qualities that the Hispanic community values about Donald Trump’s presidency. Our people are tired of hypocrisy and political correctness; things must be named as they are. In the party, especially in the Hispanic-speaking section I manage, we avoid using the term “illegal immigrant,” as I consider that a person is not illegal per se, though they may be in an illegal situation.
President Biden, by referring to an individual as an “illegal immigrant” for a crime and then apologizing, did not acknowledge that the individual’s immigration status in the United States was illegal. Such actions confuse the public perception of immigration. Not all Hispanics support what is happening at the border. As a long-time taxpayer, I am concerned that resources intended for social benefits are being wasted on newly arrived immigrants, jeopardizing our own benefits.
Furthermore, Latin American immigrants who have recently arrived do not share our culture, customs, or respect for law and authority, trying to impose what we are trying to leave behind.
Regarding the Hispanic American region and the future, with the end of Donald Trump’s term, we have seen the rise of figures like Javier Milei in Argentina and Nayib Bukele in El Salvador. Milei, an Anglophile, celebrates the arrival of American companies like Walmart in Argentina, promoting free market ideas. On the other hand, Bukele, with a different approach, does not follow the American or Anglo-Saxon model as closely, promoting unity in Mesoamerica without strictly adhering to American ideas.
Donald Trump’s relationship with these leaders varies; while he shows an affinity for Milei, he has not expressed the same interest in Bukele. If Trump were to return to power, it remains to be seen how these relationships would develop, especially with Bukele, considering his vision of a more united and strong Latin America but with ideological differences with the United States. As a Hispanic American, residing in the United States, and a member of the Republican Party, I am interested in how these dynamics will be managed in the future.
The first thing to consider is the ideal relationship between the United States and Latin America. Would it be possible to find a consensus between both parties in the United States to establish that relations with its neighbors and main partners in all aspects are governed by a state policy and not by changing governmental policies?
One of the issues that have damaged the relationship between the United States and Latin America is the variability of these policies every four years. We wonder what will happen with the relations next January if a new president arrives in the United States. This should be constant, and firmly established as a state policy to avoid arbitrary changes.
Let’s remember two points: first, Trump is campaigning and seeks to gather all the support possible, including from the significant Salvadoran community in the United States, especially in the Washington area. These American citizens might vote for Trump if they sympathize with Nayib Bukele’s management, especially for his focus on controlling crime and gangs, a serious problem in El Salvador.
The situation with Javier Milei in Argentina is more complex for the average Hispanic voter in the United States, but it is recognized that the Argentine situation needs a drastic change. Although we are not sure if all of Milei’s actions are effective, the attempt to improve is valued.
Donald Trump’s future policy towards Latin America, in case of winning the elections, will depend on the support he receives in Congress. If Republicans maintain a significant majority in both chambers, the president will have more facilities to implement his policies. Otherwise, the usual Congress dynamics will determine the course of action, often characterized by complex negotiations that can dilute the original intentions.
Unfortunately, this is how politics on certain issues are managed in the United States Congress. Traditionally, the United States only pays attention to Latin America when a crisis arises that cannot be postponed any longer. There is no proactive policy towards the region; presidents do not come to the White House with a specific plan for Latin America. If a crisis arises, they try to resolve it, and then, and only then, communication is established. During Trump’s administration, for example, there was no specific charge of Latin American policy in the Department of State.
I want to thank everyone for their presence. I’ll be brief. The electoral politics of Donald Trump, amid speculation and the generated atmosphere, raises the question about who will be his running mate in the upcoming elections, assuming he will be the official candidate of the Republican Party. Will there be any gesture towards the Hispanic American community in his electoral ticket?
From my personal perspective, and not speaking on behalf of the party I represent, I do not believe the electoral ticket will specifically seek a Hispanic American nod. When choosing a vice president, someone who adds to the presidential candidate a segment of the electorate that he lacks is sought. For example, the idea that Ron DeSantis could be the vice president makes no sense because he adds nothing new to Trump; both share the same profile.
Ideally, it would be a woman, preferably African American, from a different region than Trump’s. I would choose Tim Scott, senator for South Carolina, who is African American, represents the southern states, and has a strong Christian component, which could add to the ticket. However, I am optimistic about the possibility of a Hispanic American presence in the government, especially in the Department of State, with Marco Rubio, senator for Florida, being an ideal option.
I strongly appreciate this opportunity.